cecinestpasunepipe

Results 9 comments of cecinestpasunepipe

@JSCU-CNI looks good to me, can you just fix the remaining tests? Apart from that, I have no further comments. I also want to add that we really appreciate this...

LGTM, I have no further requests.

We appreciate your awareness of the duplication issue with Dissect artefacts. The issue arises from utilizing a diverse range of sources to curate artefacts. While our tools do address duplicates...

> We wait until we they do a release? [pypy/pypy#5006](https://github.com/pypy/pypy/issues/5006) Yes, let's give them some time to respond before we implement the notice. If the manage to fix the issue...

Unable to reproduce, it is possible to get a sample file that contains this issue?

okay, just let's add a comment then to clarify okay, for the rest your patch looks good.

Thanks for the improvements. Looks really good! We will discuss it with the team and come back to you.

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. You are right, these field types are inconsistent. We will review this issue with our team and provide you with an...

Thank you! Looks like a very interesting and useful solution. I'm going to try it myself!