Charles d'Avernas

@JBBianchi @ricardozanini Can you fix that for `0.9`, meaning now, or should we close it as part of #843 ?

@ricardozanini Can you please address that?

I think this must be fixed on 0.9.0

> I'm investing my time on 1.0.0 atm Not shit! 😆 Me too 🎉

@tsurdilo yeah, sure! It's just a cosmetic update anyways ;)

Will do asap, thanks!

@tsurdilo The roadmap has finally been updated ;) Sorry for the very long delay, had forgot about the PR

Have to refactor that one too :( Not surprisingly, became stale after like 2 years of sitting here

@lsytj0413 difficult to say, but Im not sure that's relevant in this case. Being originally intended for HTTP APIs, even if it was the most widely used, it would still...

Closed as resolved by 1.0.0-alpha1, and therefore as part of #843