Francesco Casella

@tinrabuzin, thank you for you interest in the PowerGrids library, we very much appreciate this contribution! BTW, version 1.0.0 of the library had a synchronous machine model because that is...

> Right now for the sake of simplicity I made the mechanical torque constant both here and in the dynamic model so this works, but ofc the torque characteristic should...

> I decided to define this scaled mechanical torque as `final parameter CmPuScaled(fixed=false)` which in my mind makes sense. If any option other than `noInit` is selected it will be...

> I was mentioning losses because I was assuming that if I get powerflow results from a model that does not match the steady state model of a dynamic model...

Let me recap. The stream connector concept automatically formulates balance equations for advectively carried quantities. These equations become undetermined when all flow rates go to zero, so in order to...

@tobolar, the documentation of MSL 4.0.0 states that it is based on the language version 3.4, but I'm not aware of annotation that explicitly gives this information to the compiler....

PR #187 fixes the issue. BTW, in any case, according to the specification, you always get warnings about parameters without a default binding. This not nice and potentially quite confusing...

> We also considered the solution you suggested with using asserts to inform the user about invalid input. From our perspective the check of the valid inputs should be done...

At least that is safe, because the assert prevents the user to run an incorrectly parameterized model. That is mandatory IMO. Too bad the feedback comes at runtime, but I...

@pepmts regarding the balancedness, `MetroscopeModelingLibrary.Partial.Volumes.PhaseSeparationVolume` is not partial at all: if you connect the inlet to a source flow model, the steam outlet to a pressure sink model, and the...