Carlos Duarte

@WilcoFiers have you received an answer yet?

Thanks @dd8 Assignments done

I was using "Numerical color values" from CSS 3 (https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-css-color-3-20180619/#numerical). But I'm also okay with moving to CSS 4 even if it's in draft. I'll update the PR accordingly.

@WilcoFiers, I addressed (or answered) your comments. @kasperisager and @daniel-montalvo, following @wilco's review, this rule is now a composite. Also, there were a few changes to the applicability, and to...

@WilcoFiers I've rewritten the applicability to consider the (computed) display property of the ancestor element instead of what element it is. Also, I've added another assumption to account for elements....

Some changes following @daniel-montalvo review to try to improve the readability of the applicability. Still looking forward to your comments on this @WilcoFiers Just look at the applicability of the...

All atomic rules have the updated applicability and examples in accordance. This one is ready for reviews again.

Final call ends July 10

> If I'm understanding it correctly, it makes me feel rather uncomfortable because the atomic rules seem to be checking for something that is not in and of itself an...

Taking this out of final call to address the requested changes.