Ricardo Arturo Cabral Mejía

> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 08:20:18PM -0700, Ricardo Arturo Cabral Mejía wrote: > >> I see this nip as benign but don't see the benefit yet. > >...

Nostr has been gaining a lot of popularity recently: Caution: Number of pubkeys is not very meaningful since it is trivial to create a new key-pair and most Nostr relays...

I made that plugin, talk to @Chappie05 in telegram and use the !wa command.

NACK All of this requires tying Nostr to a blockchain. I'd rather not see that ever happening.

There's a few typos (NIO instead of NIP). I like this NIP but other than requiring confirmation it doesnt offer an interoperable solution on how a client can detect they'll...

Agreed. I didn't know this either and for a while nostr-ts-relay did not treat kind 3 as replaceable. Ricardo Arturo Cabral Mejía Sent from ProtonMail mobile -------- Original Message --------...

What's missing here to move forward?

> hey all, know I am joining the conversation late but wanted to get your thoughts on using a new replaceable event kind to store pinned events instead? this might...

@jeffthibault any chance we could see a working implementation of this NIP?

> A thought I had to reduce the bloat that @fiatjaf mentioned is to make the decoy key proof event ephemeral. The clients do not need them after initial contact...