Brian Smith
Brian Smith
> Also, is it necessary to mask errors by returning Unspecified in this case? I did that since it seems that most things follow that pattern, but my usage, at...
My plan is to do an immediate release that has #937 merged, then a release that has RSA 1024 support and OAEP support soon after.
I have RSA OAEP decrypt/encrypt implemented locally and I am planning to post a PR for it after merging BoringSSL.
Yes, that's what I prefer as well! Looking forward to the PR. Let me know if you need any help.
> It seems like the SignatureAlgorithm and AlgorithmId concepts (and the related constants) are purely x509-related. Given that, it seems reasonable to put them in a signature::x509 module to avoid...
This is in 0.17.0-alpha and I hope to ship a release with it soon. I don't recommend using 0.17.0-alpha.
> like the spki name -- it's more specific to the contents. Just for my own learning, where else does SPKI get used? For example, it is used in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7250,...
> This is in 0.17.0-alpha and I hope to ship a release with it soon. I don't recommend using 0.17.0-alpha. So...0.17.0 shipped, and it includes a lot of refactoring to...
@marshallpierce. Thanks for the detailed summary. I suggest we focus right now on just the decision about how to cope with SPKI. Based on what you said, I think we...
If you'd be able to contribute towards the implementation, I can sketch out the design and review the PRs as they're posted. I will see if I can find my...