Brendon Muir
Brendon Muir
I find myself working on this again :D I think I've come closer to something that works. My scenario is this: ``` respond_to :turbo_stream, :html def create article.save respond_with article...
Thinking slightly harder, it could be that we could extend the configuration to allow for defining formats for the different request types (get, error, success) to keep everything agnostic?
Hi @markevans, is this something that we could still look to add?
Hi @markevans, absolutely not a problem! :D I'm a gem maintainer myself and know how real paying works takes priority :) I didn't realise it worked this way. I assume...
Thanks @markevans, that definitely makes sense. I suspected it would be something like that. Thanks for the detailed explainer :) Above and beyond! All the best :D
Thanks @markevans, that makes a lot of sense. I've created a PR for this. Fairly simple. Let me know if there's anything to fix :)
I've tested this approach in my app now and it works well.
I just wanted to ping in on this. In my case after creating an object with an attachment the `.path` method points at the tmpfile still. If re-find the object...
This would still be a good idea :)
Hi Amiel, that's all good. In our situation the field was optional so this had undesired effects when it wasn't filled out. I ended up having to use another plugin....