David Bosschaert

If the behaviour here is as expected how can I write a test that checks for 0.4, if it fails with 0.3999999999999991 ? Isn't this standard floating point inaccuracy? Other...

Well, `2.4/6` equals to `0.4`, so it seems wrong to specify `0.3999999999999991` even though that is in practice an acceptable value...

But if I can't even declare a clear test for such a simple rule, where does that leave me for complex ones?

@codesome that would be fine with me too, as long as I can state `0.4` and don't have to state `0.3999999999999991`. BTW note that this is just an example, for...

I guess you mean to say update to OSGi R7? That's at least what the commit does :)

LGTM

@tyge68 thanks for your patch - it was used as a basis for FELIX-5099 if I'm not mistaken. Now that FELIX-5099 has been fixed, this issue can also be closed....

This pull request doesn't look valid to me.

This is a very old issue. I'm just wondering if there are any plans to implement it? I'm just looking to write date/time exif information in case it's missing...

It seems like the https://github.com/liamstask/imagemeta-rs project has some support for it, but that one looks abandoned as well...