bosd

icon location @oca

Results 689 comments of bosd

15.0 mig users_ldap_mail

Can you please rebase?

[16.0][ADD] base_tier_validation: allow comments being optional

Looks good! I know it is not by this commit. But it is a bit confusing that the field `has_comment` actually means `can_comment`

[17.0][PORT] 699 from 14.0: base_tier_validation multiple comment with approve_sequence_bypass

Let's first merge #800 before continiung working on this one.

[17.0][PORT] 699 from 14.0: base_tier_validation multiple comment with approve_sequence_bypass

@celm1990 Can you please review?

[17.0][PORT] 699 from 14.0: base_tier_validation multiple comment with approve_sequence_bypass

Superseeded by #905

[15.0][IMP]base_tier_validation: only post notifications to reciepients

> @bosd something is wrong in the tests, can you have a look? @LoisRForgeFlow I noticed. I'm working on it right now: https://github.com/OCA/server-ux/pull/733 Yet it is a bit tricky. As...

[15.0][IMP]base_tier_validation: only post notifications to reciepients

Why does the @OCA-git-bot not attach the ready to merge label?

[15.0][IMP]base_tier_validation: only post notifications to reciepients

Thanks for the review.. > 1. When you restart a validation, and request again, you will get no message now in the chatter. Can you check if the new message...

[15.0][ENH] base_tier_validation, add Notify Reviewers by Approve Sequence

On first sight, this looks like an alternative implementation of https://github.com/OCA/server-ux/pull/638 `base_tier_validation_waiting`? The use case you describe is available in V17. So maybe backport?

Migration to version 16.0

base_tier_validation_waiting #748