Mauko Quiroga-Alvarado
Mauko Quiroga-Alvarado
@benjello I think it is because you have to rebase also the corresponding branch in the doc.
I've been tinkering with a working prototype here #1031 😃 (it works in local if you want to try it out).
@MattiSG great! In #1031 I've got all the tests passing for 3.9 but `test_shell_script_with_reform`, we can take a look together @HAEKADI if you think it could help.
Thanks, I'll leave this as draft then until moving the contribution to the doc.
Hi @nikhilwoodruff , and thank you for this contribution proposal 😃 . In terms of the feature itself, I'm at the same time happy to see @RamParameswaran proposed a pull...
Thanks for the insight of what's happening in France, @MattiSG. So, if understand correctly, metadata are being used sort of surreptitiously to accomplish two things: 1. Add new domain models...
> If I understand correctly, that means switching from declarative attributes to agreeing upon an API: each Variable should then respond to getter methods instead of directly exposing attributes. Yes....
By the way an extract of https://github.com/openfisca/openfisca-core/pull/1034#issue-718117616 I think could be pertinent here: > (...) This PR introduces the notion of `schemas`. But, contrary to regular `schemas` used to validate,...
Thanks @MattiSG 😱 ! Clearly description was not saved... I'll fix it soon.
Hello @MattiSG , I do personally do not care about the history, but I do care about coverage. > In my opinion, the fact that such a sharp drop in...