Deniz Mert Edincik

This one is a great issue, @hichana did you find out the reason ? If not I will debug this one.

Seems problem with `executeNonProgram` which doesn't have access to builtins. I wrote about this before: https://github.com/onflow/flow-playground/issues/158#issuecomment-881869616 I think same workaround although ugly can work here. I think also can be...

This is very nice idea, I think the `Signer` should be an interface, so we can extend with KMS and other providers. One thing lacking unfortunately in Flow is the...

@sideninja, I thought this would be another `Signer` interface, which will be something like `SigningEntity` ( address, keyIndex, signingFunction ) ( actually this is mapping to single public key )...

It can be nice if it can support reverse of the logic. Maybe something like Signer interface providing the public keys (with algo) it can sign for. And SDK choosing...

@Tonix517 any chance to make raw data public?

Once I started this adventure, but it was 10x more work than my initial estimated work. The main obstacles were storage access, and contract update restrictions. But I think it...

@10thfloor, This one is tricky, I checked very little but I think, as the contract is not active in the transaction it is deployed this is causing new types to...

Oh this is very hard question to answer to be honest, but in general script environment doesn't mutate any state, but for sure it can be explained in more detail.

Is there any chance to implement this before next spork ?