Evgeny Blokhin
Evgeny Blokhin
Exactly, you said that: > to support an extremely large amount of visitors and > an unpleasant user experience for the admins when there is more than one visitor at...
@embray this is still relevant. If you have time, please, contribute.
I'd be definitely interested in digging into the Turkish or Russian language support, even without the TTS/STT, but just the basic NLP/NER.
@fancycode 😢
@fancycode ping
Artur, I believe that's this: ~~https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Full (namely, https://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Test_Suite_Status). However the overall state is quite sad (404 pages, not maintained etc.)~~ UPDATE found it: https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0155 The link to the original `cade2011-schneidsut-owlfullatp.zip`...
A series of the OWL Reasoner Evaluation workshops should be probably also mentioned here, namely: * [OWL Reasoner Evaluation 2014](http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1207) ([all results](https://zenodo.org/record/11142)) * [OWL Reasoner Evaluation 2015](http://dl.kr.org/ore2015) ([report](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-017-9406-8) and [code](https://github.com/andreas-steigmiller/ore-competition-framework))...
@nicholascar my understanding is that the expressivity of these two ontologies is just too high. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
@iherman what do you think?
@ashleysommer many thanks for your kind explanation. Actually, @wrobell tried to solve this riddle as a case study for FaCT++ reasoning using his [new Python bindings for rdflib](https://bitbucket.org/wrobell/factplusplus/src/factpp/factpp) and, although...