Bastian Köcher
Bastian Köcher
The underlying "contextual execution" is correct, but the explanations on the left are wrong. A parachain candidate needs to be available to be included. The approval phase is coming later...
@crystalin if you require that you are building always on a new relay chain block, the you need to add a check in your runtime. You can register a listener...
Yes, there is a feature that needs to be activated. I think it can be done now, but there is no real need to get it done for the next...
Yes, as I have commented on the issue. @koute it is now finally time to enable this :P I think we can just remove the feature and have it enabled...
Thank you. Important here being any way that all validators support this and they support this for sure.
> i.e. we could skip from epoch 1 to 3, assuming that there were no blocks in epoch 2 (currently we do not recover from empty epochs, but that might...
> The 'epoch' naming matches the terminology in the paper. I think it makes sense to call it 'epoch' in BABE and say that we use BABE epochs to implement...
If it would be done like grandpa, where the core logic is in its own crate, for sure. However, even for the own crate, the integration should then use the...
> Is there any update on this? I would like to introduce the proper naming on Sassafras from the beginning Please let's stick to session. There can be just one...