Vitalii Levitskii

@ahrtr done, rebased on main

I [was asked](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/14354#discussion_r953155400) by @ahrtr to do it. In general I'm completely okay with the way my test is currently written. Honestly, idk how to simplify test without changing in...

Hmm, can't agree here. Even using logs for making progress in tests make me uncomfortable, honestly. But I definitely would not say that something is working based on logs. I...

I'm afraid we're stuck with this PR (because we're in a kinda closed loop). Changed e2e test cannot be rewritten with common or integration framework, because we're testing interaction through...

Maybe I didn't get the idea, but code looks broken for me: 1. Cluster state is omitted It's necessary to pass "initial-cluster-state existing" when new member is added (I think...

Then I didn't get the idea, sorry. You got rid of things that was introduced in order to make code workable.

Let's assume that initial configuration is: - base port 2000 - 2 nodes Then node A has port 2000 + 1*5 = 2005, node B has port 2000 + 2*5...

Bumped in #2258

Bumped in #2258

Bumped in #2258