Ben Smith
Ben Smith
Ah, good points. This is looking very nice now!
It sounds like [emscripten's filesystem support](https://emscripten.org/docs/api_reference/Filesystem-API.html) may be able to help here. In particular, [`IDBFS`](https://emscripten.org/docs/api_reference/Filesystem-API.html#filesystem-api-idbfs) and [`WORKERFS`](https://emscripten.org/docs/api_reference/Filesystem-API.html#workerfs) seems like they may be a good fit: > This file system provides...
This document hasn't been kept up to date, it's probably better to redirect to https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals, which has been.
Yes, I think that would be better. Thanks!
@sbc100 and I had discussed the value of having immutable tables before too.
Yes, recently :smile: (see the last paragraph of the top post) : https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/issues/1388 But before that, I don't think so; this is the main list of such instructions that were...
> Both the current Typed Function References proposal and the current GC proposal would change that to infinite value types with non-trivial (even quadratic-time in the latter case) subtyping. There...
Any new developments here?
IIRC, they are both allowed and equivalent. Has that changed recently? I suppose it would be best for tools to choose the smaller size, where possible.
I see. I'll see about implementing milestone 3 soon. Here's the link to the PR with changes: https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/commit/f9f8ffa445c2c0fe4ac284a1d12a8c5477da4457