biffgaut
biffgaut
Thanks, we'll take a look.
Thanks! I'm not deep on Appsync - so since this is our first AppSync construct and will define the interface for the service I'm going to recruit an internal specialist...
Is the current README not what you propose to expose the AppSync functionality? (e.g. - would you not expose HTTP commands in the construct interface?)
This certainly looks like an error. We'll discuss it as a team and look at addressing it. Thanks.
Fixed in PR #667, will be released in 1.153.0 and 2.6.0
It sure looks like you are correct - we'll look a little closer and update accordingly unless other info comes to light. Thanks.
Thanks - we'll take a look. Just to get some additional info in advance, if we were to add a FIFO capability to S3-SQS, then create an SQS-StepFunctions construct, would...
That's a good argument for it.
While this is not an area we can focus on in the near future, we'll add it to the backlog because the use case is something we'd be interested in...
Thanks for the feedback - unfortunately the link you provided is link results in a GitHub 404 page. Can you fix the link or better guide us to the area...