Bharath Thotakura

Addresses https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/pull/691#discussion_r1321885197

Retrieve partial job results from an unsuccessful batch job

1

### What is happening? Following PR #468, results from a successful sub-job in qss are stored and can be retrieved even if the overarching job was unsuccessful. It would be...

### What is happening? With PR https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/pull/691, `cirq_superstaq/job.py` and `qiskit_superstaq/superstaq_job.py` share a lot of common implementations. Motivated by Rich's [comment](https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/pull/691#pullrequestreview-1620127681), it would be useful to have a parent `gss.Job` class...

### What is happening? Qiskit 1.1 added a feature to add typed classical variables to a `qiskit.QuantumCircuit`. However, trying to compile a circuit containing such variables using `qiskit-superstaq` leads to...

Unable to extract sub term expectation values when using `cudaq.parallel.mpi`

1

### Required prerequisites - [X] Consult the [security policy](https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/security/policy). If reporting a security vulnerability, do not report the bug using this form. Use the process described in the policy to...

`supermarq/qcvv/irb_test.py::test_random_two_qubit_clifford` test flakes

1

The initial deploy for [`v0.5.28`](https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/actions/runs/11167141937) failed twice due to a pytest & coverage check flake: [Attempt #1 run](https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/actions/runs/11167141937/job/31042699696), [Attempt #2 run](https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/actions/runs/11167141937). See full details below: run_checks / Pytest and Coverage...

Consider updating `symengine` pin

2

### What is happening? We currently pin `symengine~=0.11.0` after https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/pull/874 in the requirements of `qiskit-superstaq`. However, that version seems to have issues building a wheel in a Python 3.13 environment,...

The [IBMQ DD notebook](https://github.com/Infleqtion/client-superstaq/blob/main/docs/source/optimizations/ibm/ibmq_dd.ipynb) should be updated to transition away from `qiskit-ibm-provider` and use a newer backend than the 16-qubit Guadalupe device.

### Required prerequisites - [x] Consult the [security policy](https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/security/policy). If reporting a security vulnerability, do not report the bug using this form. Use the process described in the policy to...