bgoodri

Nice. There may be other solutions but I am glad you found one. Be sure to read https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/how-to-update-a-package-that-has-stanheaders-and-rstan-in-its-linkingto/6041?u=bgoodri for how to get it to work with rstan 2.18.1. On Tue,...

Yes, the problem is the crossed versions. If you are developing a package to go to CRAN, then you should use the CRAN version of StanHeaders, rstan, and anything other...

Not sure. You can currently get better names in the output if you pass a list (of lists of) initial values with names, which then get copied into the output.

RStudio should work https://support.rstudio.com/hc/en-us/articles/200532197-Character-Encoding

We should fix this, but you should be using inv(a). On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Jan Gleixner wrote: > Summary: > > 1./a is parsed as 1.0/a...

Who is doing the vouching? On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Bob Carpenter wrote: > I only want to list ones we can vouch for, like Prophet and...

For R, I would prefer a link to https://cran.r-project.org/package=rstan which mentions the 50 packages that are in some way related to Stan without trying to discriminate among them. On Wed,...

I guess it should be whatever it is for x[1 + 2:3 + 9]. On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Bob Carpenter wrote: > This sounds like it'd...

Thanks for doing all this stuff with symengine and SymPy. But I think I must be missing a step to integrate with SymPy. I installed symengine.py from GitHub (although its...

OK. Does the code need to test for clang version 19 or later or would making those lines be like Bob says be fine for other compilers too?