bgoodri
bgoodri
It will probably still build on 32bit machines if you can add -flto to the compiler flags to utilize Link Time Optimization. That should keep the intermediate files below the...
If bookworm is going to use a version of Boost that is less than the BH 1.81 which is on CRAN, then you could get the previous version of r-cran-rstan...
For the next StanHeaders release to CRAN (which is being blocked by a few packages), it seems we already have the following lines in init_threadpool_tbb.hpp: ``` #ifdef TBB_INTERFACE_NEW #include #include...
So, if I understand correctly, RcppParallel/src/tbb/src/tbb/tbb_version.h is in the RcppParallel_5.1.7 that you just uploaded to CRAN, but wasn't in 5.1.6. So, if I were to upload a StanHeaders with that...
I'll look at it. The rstanarm package is hard because it has to be compiled with LTO on Windows.
I haven't yet, but I will after I deal with some final exam stuff On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM Andrew Johnson ***@***.***> wrote: > @bgoodri any chance...
I have been looking at the ones for other packages, and since this one is similar, I am sure it will be fine. I am a little bit concerned about...
I would say above 1.01 is cause for concern with Stan but we thought if there were thousands of parameters, some R-hats would be estimated greater than 1.01 even if...