Benjie
I feel like this is an editorial correction, however since it's in the algorithms I'm going to make it an RFC and we can decide if it's actually editorial during...
I do not like this syntax at all; it could easily be that you've added a field and forgotten to define the type; or simply that you forgot a `:`...
I like the idea behind this (modified) proposal, however there are some things to be aware of: 1. If the definition of a field on an interface changes, for example...
And I should mention that _literal_ embedding, as in Go, already works - simply: ```graphql type Humanoid { id: String name: String appearsIn: [Episode] } type Human { humanoid: Humanoid...
Definitely agree on the motivation for this change; thanks for the submission Janette!
I've removed the "Next stage?" label from this as it hasn't been updated in about 7 years. If someone intends to represent this at an upcoming WG, let me know...
Sorry for the delay in replying, I wanted to take some time to think about this. My conclusion is that I don't think it's the right framing. There are lots...
The copyright year is 2023 for some reason; other than that - nothing further to add! Thanks for the work on this!