Ben Lambert

@heath-freenome sounds great, is mid-august still a reasonable possibility for v5?

@heath-freenome awesome - sounds great! Thanks!

Think this could be an issue that we're also running in with slightly different output. We have a test suite over at https://github.com/backstage/backstage that when upgrading from 0.35 -> 0.39.2...

I'm not sure I understand the difference. If they're exported in the public interface of the package, they're arguably not `devDependencies` at all. Especially to packages consuming this from a...

We have tooling to prevent exactly this happening in our repository, as mentioned from @stianjensen it's a royal pain to find the type versions that you should have to install....

My thoughts are that we solved this when querying graphql client side by using fragments and spreading, surely there's some solution for the backend schema too?

@AlimovSV maybe you can raise this in a PR for approval and merge?

Need to work through the typescript issues here too, but just opened this so that theres progress on it.

As discussed before - this is gonna ship rjsfv5 + rjsfv3 together for now, and the breaking changes will be encapsulated behind the `/next` scaffolder for now. Maybe we can...

We're currently doing some work towards moving locations to entities so maybe that might make this part easier. Let's pick this conversation back up in a few weeks. +1