Ben Straub

Same comment as in #388: I don't disagree with the value proposition here, but yeah, it would require compendia to support folder structures, which they currently don't. The [last comment](https://github.com/foundryvtt/foundryvtt/issues/1109#issuecomment-1150409122)...

I don't disagree with the value proposition here, but yeah, it would require compendia to support folder structures, which they currently don't. The [last comment](https://github.com/foundryvtt/foundryvtt/issues/1109#issuecomment-1150409122) on that issue was 18...

I see the intent behind this, and it's a good one; "in progress" is a bad name for what this represents. But it's integrated with tooling, which works like this:...

Sadly this is Foundry's default behavior. It comes from D&D-like games, where your character might be named "Viscount Tortuga Mulvonass Xenosphere Mordok John Zåventëen, Third of His Name", but since...

Further recommendation: > encode sans condensed, base weight of 400. maybe noodle with the character/word spacing (i'm talking small decimal amounts in EMs) if it seems like it needs to...

Some thoughts, in no particular order. **I like the idea of having the JE be the source of truth for progress "items".** It removes the concept of actor ownership, so...

> offer an _option_ to generate a linked actor token from a journal entry with a progress track, but IMO it shouldn't be the default, because it's not the default...

> can't both of those examples be accomplished with notes? Yes, but not well. Actors are a much better-developed thing in Foundry. And I've already outlined this clunky interaction mode....

Realizing there's more to do here, so I'm reopening this.

Oh wow, looks like you found some of the earliest stuff from this system. We don't even import these things from Datasworn, I think they were all entered manually. Note...