Ben Heidemann

> Did you have a look at my comment in [#263 (comment)](https://github.com/parallaxsecond/rust-cryptoki/pull/263#issuecomment-2830158320)? Did it answer your questions? Or is there something else here to follow-up? > > tldr is that...

I don't have much to add to the discussion other than to register my interest in this feature. My reason for wanting it is (1) when I needed an alias,...

> Definitely keep this draft open so that the source can stay available, but be aware that in an effort to reduce the maintenance burden on the typeshare owners, we're...

Hey @Lucretiel, that's really exciting news! I've been working from my half baked PoC branch for a little while now so I can't wait to tidy up the code and...

Of course 🙂 let me know when you'd be ready for that PR and I'll be happy to put the work in

@Lucretiel in case you're interested, I published https://crates.io/crates/typeshare-java (excuse the lack of README - I'll fix this!). It was quite straight forward to port the code from this PR and...

Hey @Lucretiel, I've been thinking about the doc comments. Although I did find some crates which implement reflection via macros, I wasn't able to find any which expose doc comments...

> I wasn't able to find any [crates] which expose doc comments at runtime Since posting the above comment, I have become aware of [facet](https://crates.io/crates/facet): ```rs use facet::Facet; #[derive(Facet)] struct...

Since this is branched off from https://github.com/mpalmer/action-validator/pull/85, I've marked it as a draft until this is merged. I'll then rebase this PR and mark it as being ready for review.

@mpalmer this one's ready for review now