Bernhard B.

> it still could be several years on the current trajectory before the label list has sufficient detail for my use cases fair enough. While I really like the idea...

Can we maybe allow free labeling/annotating while still keeping the two-staged trending label -> productive label approach? While free labeling/annotating is ideal for power users (power users know the dataset,...

> my opinion is that more detail is always better, because it's easier to simplify rather than fill in missing information. But.. right.. someone has to make the graph yeah,...

I guess in the end we also have to ask ourselves what we want to accomplish/what's our goal. Personally, I would already see it as a huge success, if we...

> How about restricting any sort of 'new labels' to the unified view, and forgetthe task sysetm I totally get your point of view - that's totally reasonable. For me...

> broken laptop drama stalling me at the minute (moving from half-repaired machine, have to figure out if i will fully repair or replace .. split mac vs linux/win strategy)...

> (no data loss thankfully. just inconenience and un-necassery expense due to clumsy error with soup, i should know better. My desktop machine is better for work anyway. great to...

I started playing around a bit with the "plural flag": In order to get some space, I removed the mode selection from the annotation view and moved it to the...

you are totally right, the label selection in the "donate view" gets harder and harder the more labels we add. I would go even further and completely remove the label...

Thanks for the labels list - that looks really interesting! I am wondering if we can somehow make it more transparent to the user which labels are part of a...