Jindřich Bär

closed in favor of #116, all further development there

Looks good to me, thank you for your contribution! Once the tests are fixed (see the TS build issue), we can safely merge this.

Hello and thank you for submitting this issue! Other than the second point (which I have already prepared a PR for, see #190), your requests seem to be centered on...

Sorry for the delay, I actually started looking into this last week - but unfortunately didn't come to any conclusion. The 'Are you headless' website seems to utilize some kind...

@iwaduarte Make it your priority then :) PRs are welcome. Regarding the fix - I would rather not add another option in the already pretty granular options object. The other...

feel free to review, guess it sort of fizzled out @B4nan ? btw it's been buildable since the first day, it's all kinda finished now - correctness and usability remain...

Duplicate of #102 , direct cause of #100. Just like with the #102 - let us know if you find out this change (#100) trips any **real bot protection** service...

I think this one might be connected to the [`getChainCycleLie`](https://github.com/abrahamjuliot/creepjs/blob/a5815f3ea206cf83fe743d60624553a6e3e39923/docs/tests/prototype.js#L441) function from CreepJS - this tests the error line thrown by the JS execution engine when you try to set...

I guess @Equidem won't recognize his own code, I have basically rewritten the whole thing since it was forged in the ancient flames 😄 This is likely related to apify/got-scraping#65...

Hello @zuccon ! Are you sure this is an issue for this package (`apify/apify-client-js`)? To me, this sounds like a thing from [`crawlee`](https://github.com/apify/crawlee) - there, we're using `proxy-chain` to create...