Neha Bajaj

Results 12 comments of Neha Bajaj

Facing the same thing with 2.3.0 version. Did yo find the solution?

Hi @rahul2393 Do we still want to continue working on this?

@skuruppu `Ruby-oldest` is failing because of rubocop change, that can be fixed. `Ruby-newest` is failing with timeout; may be we can try running that in the main branch and see,...

Hi @NivedhaSenthil Are we still continuing the work here?

Hi @gamesover Thanks for reporting this and thank you for your patience. I'm checking internally on what could be the reason behind this. I'll get back as soon as I...

> We can make some small improvements to make the `Request` classes immutable (or less mutable). Your call. I am happy either way. By this, did you mean passing the...

I jumped the gun. The changes look good. We should wait for CI to pass.

> > Hi @ddelgrosso1, I raised this PR for the feature request #11394. > > In this, I am logging a new [trace](https://screenshot.googleplex.com/3FS8Z5pR67ZNx3i) `WriteObject/WriteObjectBufferSize` from the [WriteObjectImpl](https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-cpp/blob/93275969fd151e939f64bc32562ff9b7a1edcb82/google/cloud/storage/client.cc#L89) implementation (along with...

@shubham-up-47 As discussed offline, I think the task is to add a span for the `WriteObject` as a whole operation which we're missing right now.