Arthit Suriyawongkul

@goneall @zvr @ilans The old 5 violations about missing CreationInfo are fixed. But we have new violations about new 5 cretionInfo_*. I opened a separated issue for that at https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/936

Example validation is passed now.

@goneall please review this. All validations are passed now.

- See also https://github.com/spdx/spdx-3-model/issues/956 for the need of spdx3-validate

Close as looks like we don't want this for ISO.

Do we still want to have a section of diffs between versions somewhere on the website just like we do have in the past? If so, a diff between 3.0.1...

@bennetkl @umm0 if you know the current link, would you mind updating it please? Thank you.

Thank you. We can use any app for the meeting. Some use LF, some use other Zoom org, some use Jitsi. It's all fine, as long as it is advertised...

@NorioKobota do you mind to move all SPDX JSON files from `spdx-3.0/` folder to `spdx3.0/` folder please? Thank you The current workflow is now looking for files in `spdx3.0/` (to...

Thank you @NorioKobota and @no-ta . I think it's pretty much all good. Now we need a maintainer to approve the validation workflow - to let it pass the validation...