azu

Results 531 comments of azu

Previously, I've requested same thing https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/issues/19 and it is implemented. - https://github.com/rhysd/actionlint/releases/tag/v1.6.0 If you know missing parts, please list up these. It may help author to implement it.

📝 vanilla-extract v1.0 is released. https://twitter.com/markdalgleish/status/1398158090294292482

I've signed the CLA.

I'v made very rough https://www.figma.com/file/qdSjASOJO1Gu9oWGjz8Nvv/Secretlint-logo?node-id=0%3A1 This design is a facile. We need to match to our opinion. ![SecretLintLP](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19714/75606166-6be44780-5b2d-11ea-85d5-fd2f88343ec4.png) ![SecrelintLogo](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19714/75606165-6a1a8400-5b2d-11ea-824e-d1af4fe66de9.png)

Similar test https://github.com/textlint/textlint/tree/master/packages/textlint/test/config-initializer

I have a idea: add `includes` and `excludes` for each rule. Secretlint use minimatch and target file before linting. ```json { "rules": [{ "id": "example", "includes": ["**/*"], "excludes": ["ignored_dir/**"] }]...

https://github.com/secretlint/secretlint/issues/105#issuecomment-605930170 This concept is that secretlintignore for a rule. I think that this configuration is useful. It will improve performance and improve flexibility. As Cons, It make a bit complexibility...

https://github.community/t/workflow-status-when-all-jobs-are-skipped/17159

Also, reporting message would be specilized with it.

We need to add performance testing. [ç¶™ç¶šçš„ă«ăƒ™ăƒłăƒăƒžăƒŒă‚Żă‚’ć–ă‚‹ăŸă‚ăź GitHub Action ă‚’ă€ăăŁăŸ - ăŻă‚„ăăƒ—ăƒ­ă‚°ăƒ©ăƒ ă«ăȘりたい](https://rhysd.hatenablog.com/entry/2019/11/11/131505)