Amro Tork

@mithro Could you please do that for us?

Yes

Hi @mithro , We have about 60% of the regression tests for gf180mcu-pdk built for most of the PDK components. We just need to convert the running of those regression...

Sounds Great, we will add regression tests as CI. BTW, they take long time to run.

@mithro @mohanad0mohamed is currently working on it.

There is an issue with W/L sizing in those models, please check: https://github.com/google/skywater-pdk/issues/380#issuecomment-1569566858

@thesourcerer8 `MT` rules apply to the last metal in the stack. If you are using `gf180mcuC` then the last metal is 5.

@RTimothyEdwards Yes, Metal5 rules and MT rules both should apply on the last metal in the metal stack as we have agreed earlier in our conversation about the layer GDS...

@thesourcerer8 BTW, both are applied, you will have MT.1 (with 0.44um value) as well as M5.1 violation for klayout for that shape. If not, then please send the test case...

@RTimothyEdwards Moving forward, please take DRC rule deck from: https://github.com/efabless/globalfoundries-pdk-libs-gf180mcu_fd_pv It has been reviewed and cleaned again. I'm planning to remove DRC from https://github.com/efabless/globalfoundries-pdk-libs-gf180mcu_fd_pr LVS will be migrated soon.