Andrey Shchekin

@paulirish Not sure it is possible in general case -- doesn't Proxy have to be a separate object? So it wouldn't help if you want to watch an object already...

The technical work looks great, but I wonder if use cases (not already covered by Positive and similar checks) are common enough. What are some use cases you have in...

Thanks! Yep I was thinking of something like that or `Array.CopyTo` and similar. But feels like there are not that many of those? Also just remember one other thought I...

It is a good idea and I'll definitely do it if I update the extension, but I can't give any guarantees on the time. (As noted in the extension description...

Would be awesome to be able to filter browsers using browserslist syntax (e.g. `last 1 version, > 10%`).

@qimingyuan This might cause tests to break if Dropbox format changes and we update to a new library, while actual code won't break (because library hides the specific JSON format).

@sharwell > The fun part is generic type constraints. Why can't you just apply the attribute to generic parameter itself? That's what I did with [ReadOnly] in https://github.com/ashmind/AgentHeisenbug.

Thanks for the suggestion! It's something I considered, but it feels too complicated to be worth it (especially considering various windows people need when debugging, e.g. Watches etc). Given code...

Might need to wait for the next MirrorSharp.

Thanks -- I haven't checked PRs and issues in MirrorSharp for a while, but I'll take a look now.