Arvid Norberg
Arvid Norberg
The two first commits don't belong to this PR. Are they a prerequisite for this to work?
you're making a lot of changes to the actual bindings themselves. I don't think that's reasonable, it really risks breaking compatibility. Is there a good reason to not just add...
these checks should not apply to `.torrent` files. I imagine it would be best to have a whitelist of file extensions to apply it to. something like: `.cpp`, `.py`, `.hpp`,...
that link is broken. can you post the patch directly instead?
it's been a while, but iirc, it's mostly a bunch of classes and functions that were renamed in boost.asio.
I can see a few different ways to mitigate this. * when banning an IPv6 address, ban a whole /64 (or something wider than a single address) * have more...
one challenge with type stubs is to make sure they remain correct and aligned with the actual bindings. having a CI check for that (something like `stubtest`) would be important....
this looks like spam. Would you care to elaborate?
so, is the issue that libtorrent incorrectly assumes that the `LOOPBACK` flag on the interface means it can only reach the local machine? Does it work if you remove the...
it looks like the simulation error is legitimate and needs to be addressed