Artur Lobanov

@lathomas I used this as a reference: https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/42238 And in the PR from above it must be here: [3865030.jpeg] Fixes/impovements towards the first production version of the custom muon DPG...

Ok thanks @vlimant. Maybe it then makes sense to remove the nano part of this PR and we will later do a separate PR for the nano. In this PR...

@epalencia @aloeliger can you retrigger the tests and eventually sign please?

Hi there, just saw this (from the tsg slides). Do I understand correctly, that you haven’t used any L1 decision to seed this path previously? It would be odd but...

@rovere while you are right about the higher efficiency in the plateau, note that for low pt taus the efficiency is not that high. And from these HLT paths it...

Interestingly, this PR now also shows some differences in the Run3 `OMTFoutput_vs_uGMTinput` DQM, even though when tested alone this PR does not add the new Phase-2 OMTF into the L1...

can this PR be merged?

> Does this incorporate the actual fix for > > > For example, pDoublePuppiTau52_52 in our measurements has ~3 times the rate of pSingleTkEle36 > > as discussed in #46470?...

> @artlbv what is that status of this PR? there were some more pending checks before finishing this PR (+feedback from the P2GT that just came): [see this JIRA ticket](https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSLITDPG-1326?focusedId=6609464&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-6609464)...

> The muon quality was already updated as part of #45606. I ran over 10000 ttbar pre and post change to ensure that both cuts are equivalent. They might have...