armandomontanez
armandomontanez
[discussion] Decide whether or not to express FPU nuances for `@platforms//cpu:armv*-m*` constraints
I like the idea of having `@platforms//cpu/*/BUILD` subdirectories to express other dimensions, though I'd definitely be wary about hastily defining those. I suspect most of the time the least error-prone...
[discussion] Decide whether or not to express FPU nuances for `@platforms//cpu:armv*-m*` constraints
A few other ideas that have come up in side discussions: ## Create base platforms for projects to use Since expressivity gets a tad more complicated with these, we could...
Sounds like ye ol' circular dependency. I'll try to carve out time to take a peek at this on Monday. I think there's some nuance around lwip's `NO_SYS` mode that...
Yep! 👍 That tends to be how I solve these kinds of cycles and was going to be my first step.
I put together a presubmit in #1973 that covers the following: * Pico SDK Bazel build covering RP2040, RP2350, and a few extra configuration flavors (clang, Pico W) for macOS,...
Yep, we can close this one. We've got a pretty nice set of automated checks now.
I have more or less zero experience writing Rust, so I might need a bit of assistance getting this across the finish line. 🙂
This definitely needs some tests before merging, after I figure out how to stand a few up I'll bring it out of WIP.
I have a WIP that got it working, but it looks like libtool doesn't support incremental linking, so my solution was quite blunt. Will send out the WIP when I...