Antoine Riard

> I think it would be valuable to have CTV rather as a taproot op_success. So I’ve re-read the current version of BIP119 as available in the BIP repository, there...

the rational why it can be valuable to make CTV a P2TR upgrade only for CTV+sig kind of redeem script https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1266

> if a draft had matured a bit Hey @murchandamus, sorry but running the following unix command yields nothing about draft bip "maturity". ``` curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitcoin/bips/master/bip-0002.mediawiki > bip-process &&...

> You may read "matured a bit" as me trying to convey that this proposal seems to fall short of several requirements stated in BIP 2, including "has been submitted...

> I’m not sure I see a benefit in an opt-in mechanism for not-processing unrequested transactions. Perhaps you could elaborate how it would improve the situation. Adding an opt-in mechanism...

Shared an email on the mailing list this day to give an update on this BIP. Mainly recalling the 3 problems that it wish to improve on: - transaction-relay as...

@murchandamus > Hi @ariard, I was not able to find messages pertaining to this BIP draft on the mailing list. Has this draft been posted to the mailing list? An...

Updated at [143c993](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1663/commits/143c993c5974de14eec92b5a1d317a01056a54e9) with improvements on the BIP.

Updated at `2a0842b`. From reading Jon’s comment on the naming issue, and after brainstorming with myself alone, as this BIP can be used to introducing more compartmentalization in the p2p...

Shared an email on the mailing list this day to give an update on this BIP. Mainly recalling the 3 problems that it wish to improve on: - transaction-relay as...