Antoine Riard

@mzumsande > That has nothing to do with free relay, because it doesn't propagate to the rest of the network (hence the "relay" in the name). It's also not a...

> Would be nice to change the title from "... transactions v2" to something else. Otherwise, it may be a bit confusing in the context of "v2 transactions" (transactions with...

@maflcko Thanks if this PR can be re-opened. The more ample rational behind this work has been published here:https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2024/12/06/ and it was under embargo for a bunch of months, as...

@glozow Thanks for the comment. Have a look on the original PR on #21224, when all the existing tests at the time were fixed, before a real conversation on the...

@sipa Yeah now it’s post-embargo, I’ll update the 2 bips with more context, fix the code at minima for the 2 PRs, and prepare a list of questions on the...

> Moderation rules https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1254 that one can be removed, unless someone wishes to grab it, but I doubt... out for good of LN development, finished with the latest stuff that...

I would still advocate to have moderation rules for the lightning communication channels, like what has been done recently on the bitcoin core side. There are many stakeholders involved in...

I agree we need some moderation rules within the lightning community. In the meantime I’ll work on a bash script to do an automatic open-timestamp of all the issues on...

> This change can be composed with other opcode specifications (e.g. [CSFS](https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/op_checksigfromstack/), @jamesob see my pending email in answer to AJ for the issues with CSFS building on @naumenkogs’s TxWithhold:...

@pinheadmz Sure, the conceptual aspects of this PR are better discussed on the mailing list or delving or even on nostr with no moderators. Generally, this is up to the...