Antoine Riard

Available to review advances in dual-funded implementation, even if it's early refactor for now. I've reviewed back recently the state of the BOLT proposal and it's sounds to be mature...

Good to have this, don’t hesitate to “review pin” like glozow doing for package relay: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27463#issue-1668056618 good practice imho to allocate review bandwidth accordingly.

FYI, current version of nversion=3 and package RBF sounds working well for both dual-funding and splicing: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25038#issuecomment-1712350787 There is one caveat where the first splicing transaction transitioning from nversion=2 to...

@t-bast can you re-open it unless you define the “we” ? Thanks you.

> The four implementations have signaled repeatedly interest in defining a new commitment format that relies on v3 txs to mitigate pinning (that's the "we”). As you’re pointing in your...

I don’t think it’s really severe, so it should be okay to talk about it on a public issue.

I know it's a bit cow-boy to go to talk on a novel attack vector with no pre-disclosure warning. Though given the poor lack of ethics of a minority of...

See answer to your questions here: https://ariard.github.io/sigsoverflow.html, it’s for CTV though a lot hold for LN.

> If thinking about "validation" as management of chainstate, applying consensus rules to blocks and block transactions, etc., there is definitely no reason for validation to even know what a...

> I agree this needs a ML post. Will take care of this tomorrow. Answered back to the latest post of the PR author on the ML. I do think...