Arda TANRIKULU

Unfortunatrly that kind of chaining is not possible today

I think the scripts and configuration for Codegen are missing. Could you add some instructions to the CodeSandbox to reproduce the issue step by step, and make sure it shows...

If you have additionalProperties defined, Mesh adds an additional properties field in order to have those extra fields to be resolvers. This is intentional. If you don't want that, you...

If it is `JSON`, you can't select the fields under of it (which is related to GraphQL itself not Mesh)But if it is an object, you can select fields like...

If the generated type is `JSON`, you can't select fields like; ```graphql additionalProperties { key value } ``` If only the generated type is `XAdditionalPropertiesObjectAdditionalProperties`, you can select fields

I haven't checked the example you shared deeply but have you seen these? Extracting tokens from the cookie -> https://the-guild.dev/graphql/hive/docs/gateway/authorization-authentication#token-lookup RBAC -> https://the-guild.dev/graphql/hive/docs/gateway/authorization-authentication#rolescope-based-authentication-rbac-with-requiresscope-directive

I am not sure I follow. Could you share a reproduction in a PR or a sandbox environment like CodeSandbox?

Still I am not sure I understand correctly what you mean. If you try to return `NaN` with `Int` from `graphql-js`, it will throw an error like; `Int cannot represent...

We take `graphql-js` as a reference implementation. If GraphQL-js decides to change it, we can change it too. But for now, we want to be aligned with the existing scalar...

Could you elaborate how different this is than client-side polling?