Alex Arslan

Nope. GLM or MixedModels might but I don't know for certain, which is why I said "potentially." Perhaps nothing is using it and it would be safe to remove, but...

I don't understand the use case for capturing variable names anywhere but in the actual construction of the model terms. Also, macros don't support keyword arguments.

We should just get better about allowing function calls in formulas. (Last time I checked, we either didn't support that at all or only kind of did.) Then you can...

`fit` wouldn't even need to be a macro for the former example. ```julia fit(@formula(y ~ x1 + x2), fe=(:x3, :x4), vcov=cluster(:x5, :x6), ...) ``` You just need a `Symbol` varargs...

AFAICT that shouldn't actually be breaking though.

That definitely sounds reasonable to me! It sounds like it could be ported easily to the statistical modeling functionality that remains in DataFrames as well (though I can take care...

Sounds good to me.

That seems reasonable

Tangentially relevant but "residual deviance must be strictly lower in models with more degrees of freedom" seems not to be the case in practice for all types of models, and...

> it is like `&` but do more of it :joy: > But I don't see that as a huge problem? Using `&&` is not necessarily a problem for the...