Addison Phillips

@mihnita Can I get a PR for this? I think we discussed that in the 2025-04-21 call?

Discussed in the 2024-03-18 telecon.

This won't be resolved for the LDML46 milestone but might be considered for exit from Tech Preview.

In preparation for 46.1, I am marking this as "seek feedback" for 47

no consensus to pursue this work in the 2025-03-10 call. can reopen in the future.

(as individual contributor) > The spec should be more clear about resolution when these are in conflict with one another. I don't agree. The option `calendar` is RECOMMENDED (i.e. optional)...

@macchiati Note that some of the kinds of errors you mention are at a different level from what MF2 prescribes at the message level. > Personally, I think that it...

:datetime won't be stable until 48

need to change bad operand to bad option (2025-06-16)

In 2025-06-30 call, we agreed to merge this once @eemeli has reviewed positively. Nudging him gently with this comment.