Addison Phillips

I'm keeping this as `Future` for now, although there has been no traffic on it since last July.

@macchiati Would you prefer that we (a) mark this as `resolve-candidate` (i.e. close it) or (b) keep this issue for future consideration (post-46.1)? Implementation of this would require an additional...

Based on that response, I'm closing this. Reopen in the `Future` if interested. (Future > 46.1)

I think this needs concrete suggestions in order to be actionable. Can we produce a PR with proposed changes?

Moving to `LDML46` to match Tim's proposal.

Hi @stasm. I know you've been busy. Are you satisfied with this issue's resolution? Thanks.

The I18N WG discussed this in our teleconference of 2023-12-14 and has promoted this to a "needs-resolution" item. We agree that the description of truncation needs to clarify about the...

@hsivonen asked: > @aphillips , What's the purpose of hosting "." out of utext when localpart is defined as in the PR? AFAICT, the ABNF would mean the same thing...

Note that BCP47 is case insensitive, so the call out about that is incorrect: those are all valid tags. I tend to agree with canonicalizing underscore to hyphen, since it...

@sffc There is no chance that underscore will ever be a valid anything in BCP47. The grammar is purposefully fixed, with pathways available for future expansion via extensions and a...