Addison Phillips

We could do that, but I think that goes against authoring simplicity as I no longer know what variable is being inserted. In the case of the compound units, primary...

I think this item might now be stale, with the resolved value work that's been done. Marking to consider for closure in the 2024-11-11 call.

My comment elsewhere was basically: there are different sorts of users, but I believe (perhaps incorrectly) that all of our uses are clear. Can you identify specific instances that are...

@macchiati Can you enumerate places you'd like to see changed or which you found unclear?

Is this a dupe of #715?

Is this still something we want to do? Or are we keeping the current text?

I think the group is settled on this one over #730. Let's close #730 and concentrate on finishing this one off. Adding a note to syntax.md is probably useful.

Yes, that could work. On the other hand, a virtue of your proposal is that it avoids making implementers create a JSON numeric serializer if they don't already have one--they...

> We'd need to find a replacement for the current "key matches the production number-literal" language, as we don't have a handy ABNF rule for integers. That text is in...

@macchiati I agree with you, except: this is talking _specifically_ about the `:number` and `:integer` functions, not about any other possible number consuming ones (we should make clear, if it...