Addison Phillips

As mentioned in today's telecon (2023-09-18), closing old requirements issues.

As mentioned in today's telecon (2023-09-18), closing old requirements issues.

Given various developments, this appears like it might fit into the discussion of default registry entries.

As mentioned in today's telecon (2023-09-18), closing old requirements issues. If necessary, open new issues (in this case against the default registry)

The whole idea of a registry is basically addressing this issue. Closing this as "addressed". Open a new *specific* issue if you thing something is missing.

@macchiati The short answer is "no, I don't think so", although I think there is an issue that tracks MFv1 compatibility (#361 ) including [this comment from me](https://github.com/unicode-org/message-format-wg/issues/361#issuecomment-1454796478). We have...

This appears to have been addressed by the adoption of EBNF and later ABNF syntaxes. It is also a bit non-specific: it is a design principle that I think this...

As mentioned in today's telecon (2023-09-18), closing old requirements issues.

Re-consider post-2.0?

This PR is fine by me. I was hoping to get my paragraph out of message-format-wg#697, but we can change whatever we need to after Monday, I presume.