Addison Phillips

Addressed by #476

> That descriptor (and most of the spec text) is [from CSS2, in 1998](https://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/fonts.html#dataqual) by the way. I'll remind Martin and Misha that they missed one. 😆

@fantasai @frivoal Thanks for this fix. Alas, I just now posted some comments related to the change. I can file a new issue if needed. @frivoal I'm closing [your action](https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1197)...

(responding to the IRC log discussion in the comment above) Note that I18N spent a long time creating a document about string matching [Charmod-Norm](https://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm). When specifying string matching or when...

In our recently completed update review, we suggested: The I18N WG reviewed this in our [2023-01-26](https://www.w3.org/2023/01/26-i18n-minutes.html) teleconference (sorry that the notes are very sparse) and concluded that going to CR...

@ianbjacobs Thanks. You're right that the advice isn't quite right given the usage of SPC. Perhaps: > NOTE: Currently there is no way to indicate the language or direction of...

I was [actioned](https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/1249) by I18N to reopen this issue. We are well aware of #7071 which notes that HTML will not add new named character references. The argument in favor...

@annevk Thanks! Let's look for a suitable time slot. I'm not familiar with HTML's call schedule. Would it be possible to do a week later (assuming you have calls weekly??)...

@annevk Thanks. This isn't urgent, so let's go for February? Thinking aloud, perhaps we (meaning me) should make a list of I18N issues that could use attention ahead of time...

@past I drew an [action](w3c/i18n-actions#79) to ask for time in your April call to follow up on carryover issues. We can also work with @annevk off-line if that is a...