Anita Caron
Anita Caron
@matentzn, this issue might not be relevant anymore with the new OWLAPI serialisation, right?
From Chris' comment https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/2453#issuecomment-1148850497 > I think adding uberon domains/ranges for supplies/drains is too restricted for RO. We could either (1) rename to a more specific relation (2) add the...
What would be the name of these specific relations?
To add the two properties to RO, we still need a definition. - [ ] channels from definition - [ ] channels into definition
@bvarner-ebi, could you please discuss the next steps in the next UBERON/CL call? [There're many possible solutions](https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/2363#issuecomment-1104089640).
@cmungall, do you think this is still relevant?
We can close this issue when the new ROBOT subset command is released.
After searching and founding a sample of these terms in the last [human-view subset](http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/uberon/subsets/human-view.obo), also, there were some changes in the pipeline since the issue was open, I'm closing this...
Since last year, this has been a low priority. If it should have a higher priority, please give some action items.
Issue to remove `part_of o develops_from -> develops_from` in Uberon: - #2723 Issue to add `develops_from o part_of -> develops_from` in RO: - https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/issues/784