Konstantinos Kallas

@festutz this will be addressed by your big annotations PR (since the new annotations try RR first and then the rest). We should close it when we make this PR

Hmm, so the issue was there there existed fids with no input or output node in the graph, and so they were returned as input/output fids of the graph right?...

When this is done, we should remember to remove the `python` dependency from the `./scripts/distro_deps.sh` script.

I guess that we do manually export PASH_TOP so if `$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)` is only called when PASH_TOP is not exported, then there should be no issue right? For the...

@tammam1998 feel free to take a look if you have ideas :)

I think that we should not merge this before we investigate what are the new failing test cases. I might have some time to take a look. If we want...

I would prefer redirecting these changes to a different branch (other than future). Let's have a dspash-future branch that we will work on temporarily, and when everything stabilizes, we can...

This is an issue with how `r_split` works, and it is low priority since exporting the functions does the trick.

Thanks for reporting this! `gnulib-tool` seems to be a great stress test for PaSh. I narrowed down the issue in gnulib-tool to the following function: ```sh #!/bin/sh func_emit_tests_Makefile_am () {...

Thanks for checking this! By the way, I only mentioned shellcheck as evidence that this is not POSIX compliant (I am not sure if we can trust it for absolute...