Aneta Siemiginowska

The response showing the applied filter is good. I also like the option to have a turn off switch, but this could be added later.

@DougBurke This is still marked as Draft. I approved this PR and suggest to include in the release.

@DougBurke it looks good. I tried a few options. Thanks for the update.

@dtnguyen2 and @DougBurke The code that have been already placed in Sherpa to deal with the calibration uncertainties in included in this directory: https://github.com/sherpa/sherpa/tree/main/sherpa/astro/sim These two files `fullbayes.py` and `pragbayes.py`...

@dtnguyen2 I just built your branch and tried. The test generated the expected plot. There is an additional case: I can get a plot on high resolution grid for a...

Is there a way to implement this in a different way? We have had a capability of plotting the source component on high res grid in the 4.12 release. We...

@dtnguyen2 I see an issue with the normalization of the displayed source model for the binned data using the built of the branch: **4.12.0+183.g667c73b.dirty** It looks like the bin size...

btw. you can see that this is a bin issue - if you change the dx for the grid the source component normalization will change. We discussed this at a...

@DougBurke In our discussions with @olaurino we decided that `plot_source_component()` would display the model component on high resolution grid, while `plot_model_component()` on the data resolution. Yes, `plot_model_component` is displaying correctly...

I just rebuild to version 4.13.0+286.g7ebc7deb and the print out is exactly as shown in my previous comment above.