Anes Hasicic

Would you guys accept a PR for this if it does turn out to introduce unnecessary overhead :) ?

Is this a relatively straightforward change as it looks since sarama cluster already takes a slice of strings for topics `cluster.NewConsumer(mq.brokers, mq.consumergroup, []string{mq.topic}, config)` ?

@eandre would we be able to move forward with this?

Hey, if this one is still up for grabs I would like to take it.

Hey @pksieminski @eandre Since `secrets list` already pretty much does everything listed here apart from reporting an error, I was wondering if it makes sense to instead add a flag...

Actually, now looking at what you initially wrote: > General idea is to use this new command in GitHub Workflows, which would allow us to check PR before merge if...

Ok makes sense, but still, the reason I am asking is as far as I know (correct me if I am wrong), currently there are only two environment types as...

Now it makes more sense ;)

Hey, I submitted a PR

Hey, just wanted to follow up - are we gonna move forward with this?