Andrew Gait

Results 59 comments of Andrew Gait

This is a nice idea which requires further consideration in the future. I think it might work relatively well with the delay / weight / synapse / matrix generation that...

I think I'd say no, because the set_number_of_neurons_per_core does specify which model (not Population) that you wish to do this for. So yes, I would iterate through all current Populations...

Leaving this issue here for future consideration.

Looking at this a bit further, the overflow issue is known about already. I'm not sure anything can be done about it on the Python side that straightforwardly, as you...

Another good idea that will probably make it into a future release.

Noting here that this should probably be dealt with at some point, but it doesn’t need to happen now.

I agree with Rowley here - option 2 as he sets it out would be a much easier way to support a user like Harry for a start...

> An alternative here is to have an additional pip install that has no python code to speak of. This would simply contain the source code of sPyNNaker/neural_modelling and the...

Certain connections are now expanded on the machine (not using CSA). This is probably still an open issue for now in case we decide to implement CSA on-machine rather than...

This is definitely not something to be considered for the upcoming release.