andreazonato

> I'm sorry, i'm novice so i'm really not sure I understand your demand. I remove those two lines from the file: > > max_landtype = maxval(IVGTYP)*1.0 max_landtype = wrf_dm_max_real(max_landtype)...

Yes, I know about this issue. You are right. I was planning to submit a pull request after AMS about it Thanks Andrea

I think that for NLCD the LCZ* should be defined in different ways. It should be done in this way: LCZ_1=90 LCZ_2=90+1 and so on... inside the VEGPARM.TBL section of...

Which WRF versions are you running guys? Is it requiring LCZ to be 30-40 or 50-60?

Maybe you should simply add processors to your computation. If you are using WRF version 4.3, then LCZ should go from 30 to 40

Sorry for the late reply, I was on holidays. Yes, I think this PR solves the bug. I agree! Thanks. Andrea