Alejandro Candioti
Alejandro Candioti
I'm okay with adding it but we cannot really add it to the docs. If you remove and add nodes, the promise of the subgraph is not true anymore. Unless...
Is there a way to automate this format check? Otherwise they will eventually become inconsistent again
> @amcandio Your thoughts on next steps? I'd try to automate it somehow, otherwise it's going to be a huge manual effort for both coding and reviewing and it will...
Given that this is harder than users might realize, we should state it in the docs
@fei0319 would love to have your input here. Any other idea on how this can be optimized?
Nice, thanks for this @yxiaoaz ! I just sent a PR with first point (https://github.com/networkx/networkx/pull/7999) but I wasn't planning on taking second point. Mine is pretty small so let's merge...
> [@amcandio](https://github.com/amcandio) thanks for the invitation to this topic. Great idea @fei0319! It naturally achieves the per component separation and goes further. Feel free to implement it if you are...
> > I wonder if there is a way to make per-component approach without the interface change. Like by keeping components-views of the whole graph. > > Hihi could you...
> > I basically mean: without adding new parameters to the function > > I see, perhaps is it ok to determine whether to use component wise approach only based...
Why not removing start as an entry on the output? If it is not defined for start, why define an entry for it?